Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Holy Scriptures Study 25. Tzav (Revised)

שלום.नमस्ते.สมาธ.Pax.سلام.Peace.साटीनाम.صلح.Kwey.Amani.Udo.Barış.ειρήνη.Pace.Paz.Paix.Fred.
Frieden.Vrede.Siochana.мир.امن.和平.平和.평화.Ingatka.Wominjeka.Aloha....
ૐ.אמן

Holy Scriptures Study, Week 25 Tzav;  119.4.29;67;4O13

Torah

Vayikra 6:1 – 8:36

“The LORD spoke to (Moshe), saying:  Command Aaron and his sons thus:
“This is the ritual of the burnt offering:  The burnt offering itself shall remain where it is burned upon the altar all night until morning, while the fire on the altar is kept going on it.”  (6:1 – 2).
The Priest is to dress fully in a linen garment.
“The fire on the altar shall be kept burning, not to go out:  every morning the priest shall feed wood to it, lay out the burnt offering on it, and turn into smoke the fat parts of the offerings of well-being.”  (6:5).
The grain ritual offering is described.
“And this is the ritual of the grain offering:  Aaron’s sons shall present it before the LORD, in front of the altar.  A handful of the choice flour and oil of the grain offering shall be taken from it, with all the frankincense that is on the grain offering, and this token portion shall be turned into smoke on the altar as a pleasing odor to the LORD.  What is left of it shall be eaten by Aaron and his sons;  it shall be eaten as unleavened cakes, in the sacred precinct;  they shall eat it in the enclosure of the Tent of Meeting.  It shall not be baked with leaven;  I have given it as their portion from My gifts;  it is most holy, like the purification offering and the reparation offering.  Only the males among Aaron’s descendants may eat of it, as their due for all time throughout the ages from the LORD’s gifts.  Anything that touches these shall become holy.”  (6:7 – 11).
“The LORD spoke to (Moshe), saying:  This is the offering that Aaron and his sons shall offer to the LORD on the occasion of his anointment:  a tenth of an ephah of choice flour as a regular grain offering, half of it in the morning and half of it in the evening, shall be prepared with oil on a griddle.  You shall bring it well soaked, and offer it as a grain offering of baked slices, of pleasing odor to the LORD.  And so shall the priest, anointed from among his sons to succeed him, prepare it;  it is the LORD’s—a law for all time—to be turned entirely into smoke.  So, too, every grain offering of a priest shall be a whole offering:  it shall not be eaten.”  (6:12 – 16).
The purification offering is described.

“This is the ritual of the reparation offering:  it is most holy.”  (7:1).
“Further, any grain offering that is baked in an oven, and any that is prepared in a pan or on a griddle, shall belong to the priest who offers it.  But every grain offering, with oil mixed in or dry, shall go to the sons of Aaron all alike.”  (7:9 – 10).
The thanksgiving offering is described.
Votive and freewill offerings are described.
“And the LORD spoke to (Moshe), saying:  Speak to the Israelite people thus:  You shall eat no fat of ox or sheep or goat.”  (7:22 – 23).
“Anyone who eats blood shall be cut off from his kin.”  (7:27).
The sacrifice of well-being is described.

“The LORD spoke to (Moshe), saying:  Take Aaron along with his sons, and the vestments, the anointing oil, the bull of purification offering, the two rams, and the basket of unleavened bread;  and assemble the whole community at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting.”  (8:1 – 3).
Aaron and his sons are cleansed, dressed, anointed, ordained, and commanded to wait within the Tent of Meeting for 7 days.

--

How is the continual fire kept going during Shabbat, without violating the rules for abstaining from burning a fire?  How does this compare with the phenomenon of electricity?  Is turning on an electric light similar to placing another stick/log unto a continually burning fire?

How does the continually burning fire compare with the continually burning fire within Zarathustrianism?  What is the significance and the metaphysics of a continually burning fire?

How does the “Bread of Presence” from the grain offering compare with the practise of puja, within Hinduism?  Can this grain offering be considered as the quintessential offering within Judaism?  How does this compare/contrast with additional sacrifices (the mechanics and metaphysics) of the additional offerings prescribed through Moshe?

What is the connectivity (direct and metaphysical) between the ordination and the sacrifices being made?  How does this compare with the release of the goat during Yom Kippur?  How does this compare with the ordination process within additional religions?

--

Bhagavad Gita

Chapter 7

Jnana and vijnana are referenced.
Earth, water, fire, air, akasha, mind, intellect, and ego are the 8 divisions of the prakriti of Brahman.
“But beyond this I have another, higher nature, Arjuna;  it supports the whole universe, and is the source of life in all beings.”  (v5)
Sri Krishna describes many of the characteristics of Brahman.
The 3 gunas (sattva, rajas, and tamas) are referenced.
“The three gunas deceive the world:  people fall to look beyond them to (M)e, supreme and imperishable.
“The three gunas make up (M)y (D)ivine maya, difficult to overcome.  But they cross over this maya who take refuge in (M)e.”  (v13-14)
“Good people come to worship (M)e for different reasons.  Some come to the spiritual life because of suffering, some in order to understand life;  some come through a desire to achieve life’s purpose, and some come who are men and women of wisdom.
“Unwavering in devotion, always united with (M)e, the man or woman of wisdom surpasses all the others.  To them I am the dearest beloved, and they are very dear to (M)e.
“All those who follow the spiritual path are blessed.  But the wise who are always established in union, for whom there is no higher goal than (M)e, may be regarded as (M)y very Self.” (v16-18)
“When a person is devoted to something with complete faith, I unify his faith in that.
“Then, when his faith is completely unified, he gains the object of his devotion.  In this way, every desire is fulfilled by (M)e.” (v21-22)
“Few see through the veil of maya.  The world, deluded, does not know that I am without birth and changeless.” (v25)
“Delusions arise from the duality of attraction and aversion, Arjuna;  every creature is deluded by these from birth.” (v27)
Adhibhuta, adhidaiva, and adhiyajna are referenced.

--

Bhagavad Gita

Chapter 7 

“With your mind intent on (Me), Arjuna, discipline yourself with the practice of yoga.  Depend on (Me) completely.  Listen, and I will dispel all your doubts;  you will come to know (Me) fully and be united with (Me).
“I will give you both jnana and vijnana.  When both of these are (Realised), there is nothing more you need to know.”  (v1-2).
“Earth, water, fire, air, akasha, mind, intellect, and ego—these are the eight divisions of (My) prakriti.
“But beyond this I have another, higher nature, Arjuna;  it supports the whole universe and is the source of life in all beings.”  (v4-5).
“There is nothing that exists separate from (Me), Arjuna.  The entire universe is suspended from (Me) as (My) necklace of jewels.”  (v7).
“My eternal seed, Arjuna, is to be found in every creature.  I am the power of discrimination in those who are intelligent, and the glory of the noble.”  (v10).
“In those who are strong, I am strength, free from passion and selfish attachment.  I am desire itself, if that desire is in harmony with the purpose of life.”  (v11).
“The states of sattva, rajas, and tamas come from (Me), but I am not in them.”  (v12).
“(Benevolent) people come to worship (Me) for different reasons.  Some come to the spiritual life because of suffering, some in order to understand life;  some come through a desire to achieve life’s purpose, and some come who are men and women of wisdom.
“Unwavering in devotion, always united with (Me), the man or woman of wisdom surpasses all the others.  To them I am the dearest beloved, and they are very dear to (Me).
“All those who follow the spiritual path are blessed.  But the wise who are always established in union, for whom there is no higher goal than (Me), may be regarded as (My) very Self.”  (v16-18).
“When a person is devoted to something with complete faith, I unify his faith in that.
“Then, when his faith is completely unified, he gains the object of his devotion.  In this way, every desire is fulfilled by (Me).”  (v21-22).
“Delusion arises from the duality of attraction and aversion, Arjuna;  every creature is deluded by these from birth.
“But those who have freed themselves from all wrongdoing are firmly established in worship of (Me).  Their actions are pure, and they are free from the delusion caused by the pairs of opposites.”  (v27-28).

--

Discussion Questions From Chapters 7 – 8

In the description of the 8 divisions of prakriti, there is the presumption that Sri Krishna is speaking as a vehicle of Brahman.  Can this be understood as the 8 divisions of the prakriti of the entire Universe?

What is the difference between air and akasha (space)?

There is an interesting confluence within:  “ShalOm.”

There is an interesting correlation between the Northern and Southern paths of the Sun, during the year, and an individual’s progression towards Nirvana and rebirth, respectively.  There seems to be a negative connotation towards that which is “Southern.”  How is this to be interpreted?  Is this connected with the Varna system and the preferences placed upon the lightness of skin?  How does this exist amidst the irony that as a person is increasingly exposed to the light of the Sun, the skin of that person becomes darker?

--

Discussion Questions From Chapters 7 – 8

What is the nature of a “unified” Faith, amidst all the apparent temporal necessities that are required to sustain life?  Does “unification of Faith” essential translate to “transcendence from life”?

What is the purpose and significance regarding the guidance for preparation for death?  Is there any significance of these teachings being placed within the middle of the Bhagavad Gita?  How does this influence the context and the effective message within the teachings?

How does the instruction and practice of the syllable, “Om,” compare with the traditional practises regarding the “unpronounced” Name (Hashem) amongst Israel, “YHWH”?  And how does this compare with the utilisation of, “Allah,” within Islam?

Amidst the notion of one transcending rebirth and reaching a level of substantial equanimity, does this subsequently mean that all beings similarly attain this same level of transcendence beyond rebirth?  With such an understanding (and within such an existence), what is the actual nature of life?  Is the experience of suffering of others simply a façade, and one’s own suffering simply an entrenchment within life?

--

Digha Nikaya

Maha Parinibbana Suttanta

Chapter 5

“Now the Exalted One addressed the venerable Ananda, and said:--‘Come, Ananda, let us go on to the Sala Grove of the Mallas, the Upavattana of Kusinara, on the further side of the river Hiranyavati.’
“ ‘Even so, (leader)!’ said the venerable Ananda, in assent, to the Exalted One.
“And the Exalted One proceeded with a great company of the brethren to the Sala Grove of the Mallas, the Upavattana of Kusinara, on the further side of the river Hiranyavati:  and when he had come there he addressed the venerable Ananda, and said:--
“ ‘Spread over for me, I pray you, Ananda, the couch with its head to the north, between the twin Sala trees.  I am weary, Ananda, and would lie down.’
“ ‘Even so, (leader)!’ said the venerable Ananda, in assent , to the Exalted One.  And he spread a covering over the couch with its head to the north, between the twin Sala trees.  And the Exalted One laid himself down on his right side, with one leg resting on the other;  and he was mindful and self-possessed.”  (v1).
The Sala trees and additional flowers bloom, out of season, spreading petals and powder upon the Buddha, with additional music heard;  and the Buddha addresses this miracle.
“Now it is not thus, Ananda, that the Tathagata is rightly honoured, reverenced, venerated, held sacred or revered.  But the brother or the sister, the devout man or the devout woman, who continually fulfils all the greater and the lesser duties, who is correct in life, walking according to the precepts—it is he who rightly honours, reverences, venerates, holds sacred, and reveres the Tathagata with the worthiest homage.  Therefore, O Ananda, be ye constant in the fulfilment of the greater and of the lesser duties, and be ye correct in life, walking according to the precepts;  and thus Ananda, should it be taught.’”  (v3).
The Buddha instructs his attendant, Upavana, to move aside so that the angels can view the Buddha.
“But the spirits who are free from passion bear it, calm and self-possessed, mindful of the saying which begins:-- ‘Impermanent indeed are all component things.  How then is it possible whereas anything whatever, when born, brought into being, and organized, contains within itself the inherent necessity of dissolution—how then is it possible that such a being should not be dissolved?  No such condition can exist!’”  (v6).
“There are these four places, Ananda, which the believing clansman should visit with feelings of reverence.  Which are the four?
“The place, Ananda, at which the believing man can say:-- ‘Here the Tathagata was born!’  is a spot to be visited with feelings of reverence.
“The place, Ananda, at which the believing  man can say:-- ‘Here the Tathagata attained to the supreme and perfect insight!’ is a spot to be visited with feelings of reverence.
“The place, Ananda, at which the believing man can say:-- ‘Here was the kingdom of righteousness set on foot by the Tathagata!’ is a spot to be visited with feelings of reverence.
“The place, Ananda, at which the believing man can say:-- ‘Here the Tathagata passed finally away in that utter passing away which leaves nothing whatever to remain behind!’ is a spot to be visited with feelings of reverence.  These are the four places, Ananda, which the believing clansman should visit with feelings of reverence.’”  (v8).
“ ‘How are we to conduct ourselves, (leader), with regard to womankind?’”
“ ‘As not seeing them Ananda.’”
“ ‘But if we should see them, what are we to do?’”
“ ‘No talking, Ananda.’”
“ ‘But if they should speak to us, (leader), what are we to do?’”
“ ‘Keep wide awake, Ananda.’”  (v9).
The Buddha instructs for his remains to be treated as that of a king of kings, with a cairn erected.
The Buddha describes 4 types of people worthy of such a cairn:  an “able awakened one”, “one awakened for one’s self,” a “genuine hearer of the Tathagata,” and a “king of kings.”
Ananda weeps at the thought of the passing of the Buddha;  the Buddha sends for Ananda, and reassures Ananda, commending Ananda’s acts, words, and thoughts.
Ananda recommends for the Buddha to travel to an increasingly auspicious location in which to pass from life;  the Buddha describes the auspiciousness of Kusavati.
The Buddha sends Ananda to inform the Mallas, of Kusinara, of the Buddha’s eventual passing, and to provide reassurance of this occurrence happening within the vicinity of the Mallas.
The Mallas go to visit the Buddha, and Ananda sends the Mallas in by groups of families.
“Now at that time a Wanderer named Subhadda, who was not a believer, was dwelling at Kusinara.  And the Wanderer Subhadda heard the news:-- ‘This very day, they say, in the third watch of the night, will take place the final passing away of the Samana Gotama.’
“Then thought the Wanderer Subhadda:-- ‘This have I heard from fellow Wanderers old and well stricken in years, teachers and disciples, when they said:-- ‘Sometimes and full seldom do Tathagatas appear in the world, the Able Awakened Ones.’  Yet this day, in the last watch of the night, the final passing away of the Samana Gotama will take place.  Now a certain feeling of uncertainty has sprung up in my mind;  and this faith have I in the Samana Gotama, that he, methinks, is able to present the (Truth) that I may get rid of this feeling of uncertainty.’”  (v23).
Ananda refuses to let Subhadda visit the Buddha, and Subhadda makes the request 3 times;  the Buddha hears Subhadda’s request and permits Subhadda to visit him.
“And when he was thus seated, Subhadda, the Wanderer, said to the Exalted One:-- ‘The leaders in religious life who are heads of companies of disciples and students, teachers of students, well known, renowned, founders of schools of doctrine, esteemed as good men by the multitude—to wit, Purana Kassapa, Makkhali of the cattle-pen, Agita of the garment hair, Kakkayana of the Pakudha tree, Sangaya the son of the Belatthi slave-girl, and Nigantha of the Natha clan—have they all, according to their own assertion, thoroughly understood things?  Or have they not?  Or are there some of them who have understood, and some who have not?’”  (v26).
“And the Exalted One spake:-- ‘In whatsoever doctrine and discipline, Subhadda, the Aryan eightfold path is not found, neither in it is there found a man of (True) saintliness of the first, or the second, or of the third, or of the fourth degree.  And in whatsoever doctrine and discipline, Subhadda, the Aryan eightfold path is found, in it is found the man of (True) saintliness of the first, and the second, and the third, and the fourth degree.’”  (v27).
Subhadda celebrates the Buddha’s doctrine and proclaims himself as the Buddha’s disciple;  the Buddha accepts Subhadda and waives the customary probationary period.
“So Subhadda, the Wanderer, was received into the higher grade of the Order under the Exalted One;  and from immediately after his ordination the venerable Subhadda, remained alone and separate, attained to that supreme goal of the higher life, for the sake of which the clansmen go out from all and every household gain and comfort to become houseless wanderers—yea, that supreme goal did he, by himself, and while yet in this visible world, bring himself to the knowledge of, and continue to realize, and to see face to face!  And he became conscious that birth was at an end, that the higher life had been fulfilled, that all that should be done had been accomplished, and that after this present life there would be no beyond!
“So the venerable Subhadda became yet another among the Arahants;  and he was the last disciple whom the Exalted One himself converted.”  (v30).

--

How do the “locations to be reverenced” compare with the teaching to maintain equanimity?  What is the distinction between the doctrine provided to the Sangha of Bodhisattvas, Bhikshus (and Bikkhunis), and Tathagatas compare with the allowances provided to “lay members” or the Sangha?  Does this establish an effective binary caste system?  How does this compare with similar distinctions within Judaism (with the Kohanim), within Christianity (between apostles and the unconverted), within Islam (between believers and unbelievers), and Hinduism (with the traditional system of varnas)?

How does the Buddha’s doctrine regarding women compare with those respectively provided from Jesus, Moshe, and Muhammad (and any inferred doctrine provided from Sri Krishna)?  How does the guidelines regarding Buddhist Nuns emerge and develop within Buddhism?  How are Tathagatas to interact with members of the opposite sex when going on rounds for alms?  What significance and lessons exist within the consideration that even the practise of the “beggar’s bowl” maintains the propensity for soliciting the existence of a person of the opposite sex, and perhaps intrinsically, “becoming”?

How does the “last watch of the night” (within Verse 23) compare with the “watches of the night” described within the Gospels?  How does Midnight become a point that is recognised as the beginning of a day (compared with the setting of the Sun or the rising of the Sun)?  How does the duration of each “watch” of the night and day emerge?

Within the practise of asceticism respectively within Buddhism and Hinduism (and within additional religious traditions, such as Christianity), there is the utilisation of the term, “renouncing the World;”  and whilst this substantially pertains to the pursuit of material gain, there is also a significant, coinciding practise of renouncing one’s familial relationships and social status, with particular consideration for maintaining equanimity towards all people and sentient beings;  however, even amidst such equanimity, there remains some pursuit of material gain (even if only in filling the beggar’s bowl);  is there any legitimacy within the consideration that rather than “renouncing one’s familial relationships,” an ascetic is simply “embracing the entire Universe,” which also includes one’s respective family members?  How may be applied Jesus’s teaching regarding “a Prophet being without honour in the Prophet’s own home/country” (as well as the temporal challenges that Muhammad (PBUH) experiences in Mekkah;  as well as the journeys of Avraham and Yaakov, as well as that of the Israelites from Egypt, within the Wilderness, and within Eretz Israel)?  And amidst the propensity of an individual being able to continue to interact within an individual’s own family members, what intrinsic and unique responsibilities does an individual maintain towards an individual’s own respective family members;  is loyalty a relevant principle?  Amidst the practise of “severe” asceticism, does such an ascetic maintain any responsibility for building and/or maintaining relationships with the “lay believers/Faithful,” and even in maintaining distinctions between fellow/filla ascetics (within one’s own Sangha) and people outside of that fold?  Is this is what is meant when the Buddha describes being able to “make distinctions” amongst individuals?

--

Gospels

Luke 5

Jesus advises Simon (Peter) to cast his fishing net in a specific location, and there is a bounty of fish;  Simon (Peter) is amazed.
“Do not be afraid;  henceforth you will be catching men.”  (v10)
Jesus heals a leper.
“And he stretched out his hand, and touched him, saying, ‘I will;  be clean’”  (v13)
People bring paralytic to Jesus through roof of dwelling and Jesus forgives his sins.
Pharisees admonish Jesus for presuming such authority to forgive sins;  Jesus provides responsive challenge.
Jesus recruits the tax collector, Levi.
“And Jesus answered them, ‘Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick;  I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.’”
“And Jesus said to them, ‘Can you make wedding guests fast while the bridegroom is with them?  The days will come, when the bridegroom is taken away from them, and then they will fast in those days.’”  (v35)

--

Gospels

Luke 6

“On (Shabbat), while he was going through the grainfields, his disciples plucked and ate some heads of grain, rubbing them in their hands.”  (v1)
Pharisees challenge Jesus;  Jesus proclaims such behaviour permissible, comparing it to David eating the Bread of the Presence;  Jesus proclaims himself as leader of Shabbat.
“And Jesus said to them, ‘I ask you, is it lawful on (Shabbat) to do good or to do harm, to save life or to destroy it?”  (v9)
“In these days he went out to the mountain to pray;  and all night he continued in prayer to God.  And when it was day, he called his disciples, and chose from them twelve, whom he named apostles;  Simon, whom he named Peter, and Andrew his brother, and James and John, and Philip, and Bartholomew, and Matthew, and Thomas, and James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon who was called the Zealot, and Judas the son of James, and Judas Iscariot, who became a traitor.”  (V12-16)
Jesus provides the Sermon on the Mount.
“Blessed are you poor, for yours is the (Sovereignty) of God.
“Blessed are you that hunger now, for you shall be satisfied.
“Blessed are you that weep now, for you shall laugh.”  (v20-21)
“But I say to you that hear, Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you.”  (v27-28)
“To him who strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also;  and from him who takes away your coat do not withhold even your shirt.  Give to every one who begs from you;  and of him who takes away your goods do not ask them again.”  (v29-30)
“And as you wish that men would do to you, do so to them.”  (v31)
“If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you?”  (v32)
“But love your enemies, and do good, and lend, expecting nothing in return;  and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High.”  (v35)
“Judge not, and you will not be judged;  condemn not, and you will not be condemned;  forgive, and you will be forgiven;  give, and it will be given to you.”  (v37)
“Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?”  (v41)
“The good man out of the good treasure of his heart produces good”  (v45)
Jesus utilises the parable of a man building a house on solid foundation, and a man building a house on an unstable foundation.

--

Gospels

Luke 5   

“While the people pressed upon him to hear the word of God, he was standing by the lake of Gennesaret.  And he saw two boats by the lake;  but the fishermen had gone out of them and were washing their nets.”  (v1-2).
Jesus tells Peter to let down the nets, and Peter catches an abundance of fish.
“But when Simon Peter saw it, he fell down at Jesus’ knees, saying, ‘Depart from me, for I am a sinful man, O (Leader).’  For he was astonished, and all that were with him, at the catch of fish which they had taken;  (v8-9).
Jesus heals a man with leprosy.
People bring a paralytic through the roof to be healed.
Jesus summons Levi, the tax collector.
Jesus is asked about eating with unwashed hands, and the practises of eating and drinking;  Jesus responds with the teaching regarding new wineskins for new wine.

--

Gospels

Luke 6

“On (Shabbat), while he was going through the grainfields, his disciples plucked and ate some heads of grain, rubbing them in their hands.  But some of the Pharisees said, ‘Why are you doing what is not lawful to do on (Shabbat)?’”  (v1-2).
Jesus refers to a story of David, and proclaims leadership during Shabbat.
“On another (Shabbat), when he entered the synagogue and taught, a man was there whose right hand was withered.  And the scribes and the Pharisees watched him, to see whether he would heal on (Shabbat), so that they might find an accusation against him.  But he knew their thoughts, and he said to the man who had the withered hand, ‘Come and stand here.’  And he rose and stood there.  And Jesus said to them, ‘I ask you, is it lawful on (Shabbat) to do (benevolence) or to do harm, to save life or to destroy it?’  And he looked around on them all, and said to him, ‘Stretch out your hand.’  And he did, and his hand was restored.  But they were filled with fury and discussed with one another what they might do to Jesus.”  (v6-11).
“In those days he went out to the mountain to pray;  and all night he continued in prayer to God.  And when it was day, he called his disciples, and chose from them twelve, whom he named apostles;  Simon, whom he named Peter, and Andrew his brother, and James and John, and Philip, and Bartholomew, and Matthew, and Thomas, and James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon who was called the Zealot, and Judas the son of James,  and Judas Iscariot, who became traitor.”  (v12-16).
Jesus preaches the Sermon on the Mount.
“And he lifted up his eyes on his disciples, and said:
“Blessed are you poor, for yours is the (Sovereignty) of God.
“Blessed are you that hunger now, for you shall be satisfied.
“Blessed are you that weep now, for you shall laugh.
“Blessed are you when men hate you, and when they exclude you and revile you, and cast out your name as evil, on account of the Son of man!  Rejoice in that day , and leap for joy, for behold your reward is great in heaven;  for so their fathers did to the prophets.”  (v20-23).
“But I say to you that hear, Love your enemies, do (benevolence) to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you.  To him who strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also;  and from him who takes away your coat do not withhold even your shirt.  Give to everyone who begs from you;  and of him who takes away your (possessions) do not ask them again.  And as you wish that mend would do ot you, do so to them.  (v27-31).
“If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you?”  (v32).
“But love your enemies, and do (benevolence), and lend, expecting nothing in return;  and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High;  for (Deus) is kind to the ungrateful and the selfish.  Be merciful, even as your (Deus) is merciful.”  (v35-36).
“Judge not, and you will not be judged;  condemn not and you will not be condemned;  forgive, and you will be forgiven;  give, and it will be given to you.”  (v37-38).
Jesus tells parable of blind leading blind.
“A disciple is not above his teacher, but every one when he is fully taught will be like his teacher.”  (v40).
“Why do you see the peck that is in your brother’s eye, but do notice the log that is  in your own eye?”  (v7).
“Why do you call me, ‘(Leader), (Leader),’ and not do what I tell you?”  (v46).

--

Discussion Questions From Chapters 3 – 5

How does this passage within the third chapter of the Gospel of Luke, describing the ascension of Jesus into Heaven and the proclamation made by God, compare with the communication of Adonai with Moshe, and with the conversation between Arjuna and Sri Krishna and Brahman?

One of the temptations of the devil is the offering of sovereignty of the entire realm of Earth;  how does this compare with the proclamation of maintaining sovereignty throughout Heaven?  And how does that compare with the limitation that Jesus describes, elsewhere in the Gospels, regarding the determination of who sits on his right hand and on his left hand being made by God?

There seems to be a significant amount of profundity amidst the simplicity of, “I will;  be clean.”  What is the metaphysical nature of Jesus’s healing power?  Is this derived though the accumulation of his personal energy?  Is it possible to heal the physical and additional ailments of others simply through concentration, compassion, and communication?

After receiving the healing, why do many people act directly against the instructions that Jesus provides and make proclamations about him?  What does Jesus intend by people abstaining from making such proclamations?

What exists within the intrinsic proclamations of forgiveness of sins that Jesus communicates?  Are people’s respective, previous transgressions the actual cause of physical ailments?  Is it possible for another individual to proclaim forgiveness us such sins;  and, if so, what are the implications of such forgiveness?  Does that individual simply incur the “bad Karma” of those transgressions?  Is this what eventually causes Jesus’s crucifixion?  How does this compare with the teachings with Islam, and additional religious traditions, regarding each person only being able to bear the burden of each person’s own respective actions?  Is it possible for an individual to forgive, and heal, one’s own self?  How might this be done?

Within the fifth chapter of the Gospel of Luke, Jesus proclaims that he abstains from coming for the righteous (presumably meaning the Pharisees), and refers to his followers as “sinners;”  how does this compare with Jesus’s message within the Sermon on the Mount, proclaiming the downtrodden to be the righteous of the Earth, and the meek to inherit the Earth?  And how does this compare with the admonishment that Jesus communicates towards the leaders of Israel?  What are the congruencies and the contrasts within these different messages?  Does the doctrine of Jesus change as his ministry progresses?


Based upon Jesus’s parable of the bridegroom, and upon the subsequent crucifixion of Jesus, are the apostles of Jesus supposed to be “fasting,” and if so, what is that fast supposed to resemble?

--

Discussion Questions From Chapters 6 – 7

Within Chapter 6, Jesus challenges the conventional practises of Shabbat;  and whilst there are provisions within the Torah to help and heal people, particularly within an emergency, there is also the consideration of whether the man, with the withered hand, can actually wait until the evening or the next day to be healed?  How are emergency medical services legitimated during Shabbat, and what about military, police, and additional services that are other than emergency, yet practiced during Shabbat?  Is there any legitimacy and/or concern within the notion that everybody rests during Shabbat except for Rabbis and housewives?

The teachings within the Sermon on the Mount is extremely compelling, however, it seems as though some Christians suggest that this is hyperbole, and that the intended meaning is other than to literally “turn the other cheek;”  is this accurate?  Are these teachings intended to be nuanced within pragmatic compromises and assimilation within conventional authority, or are these teachings intended as practises of radical love and compassion?  Is this type of radical love sustainable?  And how do these teachings compare with Jesus’ rebuking of the Pharisees and additional conventional leaders and citizens who refuse to praise God in the manner stipulated by Jesus?  Is this radical love the source wherein the strength of Jesus’ example derived?

How do the teachings of forgiveness that Jesus provides compare with additional teachings of forgiveness found within the Jubilee and redemption of slaves in Judaism, the teachings of forgiveness within the Koran, the compassion taught by the Buddha, and the practise of equanimity provided from Sri Krishna and the Bhagavad Gita?

Does the teaching of “give and it will be given to you” become susceptible to the criticism of the “carrot and the stick” approach of Heaven and Hell by simply enlarging the repercussions of temporal behaviour to include increasingly ambiguous and severe circumstances and experiences?  How does this compare and contrast with similar, repeated teachings within the Koran of Islam;  and how does this compare and contrast with the apparently converse approach of equanimity and indifference (transcending the gunas) provided by the Bhagavad Gita of Hinduism and similarly within Buddhism?

Why does Jesus abstain from clearly and explicitly proclaiming himself as the Moshiach?

--

Discussion  Questions From Chapters 3 – 5

How do John the Baptist’s teachings compare with Jesus’s teachings?  On the polar scale of assimilation and readicalness, where do each of these teachings exist within that spectrum?

How does Jesus’s described encounter with Heaven compare with additional “Heavenly” encounters respectively experienced by Israel, Moshe, Avraham, the Buddha, Jesus, and additionally?

How does Jesus’s age compare with Yoshua’s and Eleazar’s respective ages, as well as those respectively of different Prophets?

Is there any significance and/or intentionality with Jesus’s hereditary line being listed directly amidst the description of his ascension into Heaven and his experience within the wilderness?
         
What is the significance of Jesus being hungry after his experience within the wilderness;  and what is the nature of this hunger making him susceptible to temptation?  And amidst his subsequent miracle of feeding the 1000’s with only a few loaves, and Jesus’s withering of the fig tree and his teaching regarding moving mountains, why does Jesus refuse to turn the stone into bread to feed himself?  Is this simply a manner of refusing the temptation, rather than the act, itself, possessing any unethical quality?

Why does Jesus wait until after the 3rd solicitation to command the temptations to be cast away, instead of simply warding off the temptation immediately?  What “power” exists within the tempter to influence Jesus to even consider the temptations (and to be lead upon the heights to view the kingdoms and additionally)?

Within the wilderness Jesus is given the temptation of ruling over all the kingdoms of the world, and he refuses this;  however, subsequently within the Gospels, Jesus proclaims authority of Heaven throughout the Universe (being equated with Deus);  so amidst such a proclamation, what actual temptation is provided within the wilderness concerning the perceivably mundane kingship of the world?  Is it possible that Jesus does, indeed, experience the temptation within the wilderness, and only later arrives at the understanding of such a celestial existence beyond the Universe;  and if so, at what point is that Realisation made (particularly considering his childhood proclamations of his immediacy with Deus);  if otherwise (if he already has that knowledge), then what exactly is the nature and the purpose of the temptation within the wilderness?  And how does such potentially gradual Realisation compare with the distinct stages of spiritual progression (amidst Enlightenment and Nirvana) of the Buddha?  And how does this compare with the progression of Moshe’s temporal life, as well as that of Muhammad (PBUH), and additional Prophets?

How does the solicitation for Jesus to jump from the Temple compare with Avraham’s trial in sacrificing Yitzak?

How does the “unacceptability” of a Prophet in his own country compare with the respective experiences of Avraham, Moshe, Muhammad (PBUH), the Buddha, and additionally?  What is the nature and intrinsic characteristics of Prophethood that can be gleaned from this teaching and these examples?

Do scribes have an intrinsic tendency of being feeble (unauthoritative)?  What may be some examples that support and absolve this observation?

Amidst the description of Jesus retreating to a “lonely” location, there is the consideration:  what is the nature of Jesus’s personality and individual characteristic traits?

--

Discussion Questions From Chapters 6 – 7

What is the nature of the interaction between Jesus’s teachings regarding Shabbat, and the subsequent traditional observance of Sunday Worship, with Christianity?

How does Jesus’s “reward in Heaven” compare with the Koran’s “Gardens of Paradise”?

--

Koran

Sura 27:  An Naml

“Benignant, Hearing God!  These are the verses of the Quran and the Book that makes manifest:
“A guidance and (benevolent) news for the believers.
“Who keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, and they are sure of the Hereafter.
“Those who believe not in the Hereafter, We make their deeds fair-seeming to them, but they blindly wander on.”  (v1-4).
Narrative of Moshe, and David and Solomon are shared.
“And Solomon was David’s heir, and he said:  O men, we have been taught the speech of birds, and we have been granted of all things.  Surely this is manifest grace.
“And his hosts of the jinn and the men and the birds were gathered to Solomon, and they were formed into groups.
“Until when they came to the valley of the Naml, a Namlite said:  O Naml, enter your houses, lest Solomon and his hosts crush you, while they know not.
“So he smiled, wondering at her word, and said:  My Lord, grant me that I may be grateful for Thy favour which Thou hast bestowed on me and on my parents, and that I may do (benevolence) such as Thou art pleased with, and admit me, by Thy mercy, among Thy righteous servants.
“And he reviewed the birds, then said:  How is it I see not Hudhud, or is it that he is one of the absentees?
“I will certainly punish him with a severe punishment, or kill him, or he shall bring me a clear excuse.
“And he tarried not long, then said:  I have compassed that which thou hast not compassed and I have come to thee from Saba with sure information—
“I found a woman ruling over them, and she has been given of everything and she has a mighty throne.
“I found her and her people adoring the sun instead of Allah, and the devil has made their deeds fair-seeming to them and turned them from the way, so they go not aright—”  (v16-24).
“She said:  O chiefs, an honourable letter has been delivered to me.
“It is from Solomon, and it is in the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful,
“Proclaiming, Exalt not yourselves against me and come to me in submission.”
“She said:  O chiefs, advise me respective my affair;  I never decide an affair until you are in my presence.”  (v29-32).
“She said:  Surely the kings, when they enter a town, ruin it and make the noblest of its people to be low;  and thus they do.
“And surely I am going to send them a present, and to see what answer the messengers bring back.
“So when the envoy came to Solomon, he said:  Will you help me with wealth?  But what Allah has given me is better than that which (Allah) has given you.  Nay, you are exultant because of your present.”  (v34-36).
“He said:  Alter her throne for her;  we may see whether she follows the right way or is of those who go not aright.”  (v41).
“And that which she worshipped besides Allah prevented her;  for she was of a disbelieving people.
“It was said to her:  Enter the palace.  But when she saw it she deemed it to be a great expanse of water, and prepared herself to meet the difficulty.  He said:  Surely it is a palace made smooth with glass.  She said:  My (Leader), surely I have wronged myself, and I submit with Solomon to Allah, the Lord of the worlds.”  (v43-44).
The narrative of Thamud is shared.

--

Can the narrative within Naml be also understood as a narrative regarding Solomon’s interaction with the Queen of Sheba (from Ethiopia), as described within the Tanakh of Judaism?  What may be some implications of the confluence of these narratives (is there any condescending intention that be extrapolated from the link between the Naml [as animals] and the people of Sheba)?

Does the letter from Solomon solicit submission to Solomon or to Allah (“coming to Solomon in submission”)?  Is such ambiguous reference to Allah simply a factor of English translation or is there intentionality within the Arabic language?

How does Solomon’s response to the Queen of Sheba compare with _________, from the Torah?

--

May Love, Peace, And Blessings Of The Highest Authority We Respectively Recognise, Known By Many Names, Including God, El Shaddai, Eloheinu, Elohim, Adonai, Hashem, Brahman, Nirvana, Dharma, Karma, Tao, Gud, Dieu, Deus, Dios, Dominus, Jah, Jehovah, Allah, Ahura Mazda, Vaya Guru, The Divine, Infinity, Logic, Wakan Tanka, And Additionally Be Upon The Rishis, Moshe, The Buddha, Jesus, Muhammad, Baha’u’llah, Guru Nanak, Zarathustra, Avraham, Yitzak, Yaakov, Confucius, Lao Tzu, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Black Elk, Martin Luther, Gandhi, Bob Marley, The Respective Indigenous Of Taínoterranea, Asia, Europe, Mediterranea, Africa, The Earth, Galaxy, Universe, Our Families, Friends, And The Universe.  Om.  Shanti.  Shanti.  Shantihi.  Amen.

שלום.नमस्ते.สมาธ.Pax.سلام.Peace.साटीनाम.صلح.Kwey.Amani.Udo.Barış.ειρήνη.Pace.Paz.Paix.Fred.
Frieden.Vrede.Siochana.мир.امن.和平.平和.평화.Ingatka.Wominjeka.Aloha....
ૐ.אמן
Shalom(Hebrew).Namaste(Sanskrit).Samadhi(Thai/Pali).Pax(Latin).Salaam(Arabic).Peace(English).
SatNam(Punjabi).Solh(Persian).Kwey(Algonquin).Amani(Swahili).Udo(Ibo).Barish(Turkish).Erieni(Greek).Pache(Italiano).Paz(Espanol).Paix(Francais).
Fred(Scandinavian).Frieden(Deutsch).Siochana(Irish).Mir(Russian).Amin(Urdu).Heping(Mandarin).Heiwa(Japanese).Pyeonghwa(Korean).
Ingatka(Tagolog).Wominjeka(Wurundjeri).Aloha(Hawai’ian).Peace(Common Symbol).Peace(Common Sign).Peace(American Sign).Peace(American Braille).
Om. Amen.



No comments:

Post a Comment